Recently I had the opportunity (
HT Let's Play Math) to read an article
"Word Problems in Russia and America" by Andrei Toom. It is an extended version of a talk at the Meeting of the Swedish Mathematical Society in June, 2005.
It made for quite interesting reading.
The article was comparing word problems in Russian and U.S. math books. As you can guess, the former were far more advanced than the latter.
I want to highlight a few things from the article. You're very welcome to download and read it too from the above link.
A problem from a Russian fourth grade book:
An ancient artist drew scenes of hunting on the walls of a cave, including 43 figures of animals and people. There were 17 more figures of animals than people. How many figures of people did the artist draw?
A similar problem is included in the 5th grade Singapore textbook:
Raju and Samy shared $410 between them. Raju received $100 more than Samy. How much money did Samy receive?
Now, these are not anything spectacular. You can solve them for example by taking away the difference of 17 or $100 from the total, and then dividing the remaining amount evenly:
$410 − $100 = $310, and then divide $310 evenly to Raju and Samy, which gives $155 to each. Give Raju the $100. So Samy had $155 and Raju had $255.
A far as the figures, 43 − 17 = 26, and then divide that evenly: 13 and 13. So 13 people and 30 animal figures.
BUT in the U.S., these kind of problems are generally introduced in Algebra 1 - ninth grade, AND they are only solved using algebraic means.
I remember being aghast of a word problem in a modern U.S.
algebra textbook:
"Find two consecutive numbers whose product is 42."
Third-grade kids should know multiplication well enough to quickly find that 6 and 7 fit the problem! Why use a "backhoe" (algebra) for a problem you can solve using a "small spade" (simple multiplication)!
I know some will argue and say, "Its purpose is to learn to set up an equation." But for that purpose I would use some some more difficult number and not 42. Doesn't using such simple problems in algebra books just encourage students to forget common sense and simple arithmetic?
(BTW, no matter what number you'd use − "Find two consecutive numbers whose product is 13,806" − I'd just take the square root and find the neighboring integers, and check.)
And this is what Toom also wonders greatly: why do U.S. instructors not teach children to solve many-step word problems using arithmetic only? It is as if the more complex word problems are extinct in the standard textbooks until algebra, and word problems in elementary grades are mostly reduced to one or two-step simple problems.
(
I've written about that before, how the word problems found in lesson X are always solved using the operation taught in lesson X.)
Another example, a 3rd grade problem from Russia:
A boy and a girl collected 24 nuts. The boy collected two times as many nuts as the girl. How many did each collect?
You could draw a boy and a girl, and draw two pockets for the boy, and one pocket for the girl. This visual representation easily solves the problem.
Here's an example of a Russian problem for grades 6-8:
An ancient problem. A flying goose met a flock of geese in the air and said: "Hello, hundred geese!" The leader of the flock answered to him: "There is not a hundred of us. If there were as many of us as there are and as many more and half many more and quarter as many more and you, goose, also flied with us, then there would be hundred of us." How many geese were there in the flock?
(I personally would tend to set up an equation for this one but it can be done without algebra too.)
Toom talks about how "real life" word problems are emphasized in America, and "fantastic" problems that could not occur in reality are devalued. For example, a problem such as
"
Sally is five years older than her brother Bill. Four years from now, she will
be twice as old as Bill will be then. How old is Sally now?" may be deemed unfit since nobody would want to know such in real life.
However, like Toom argues, such problems do serve a purpose: that of developing children's logical and abstract thinking and mental discipline. One-step word problems won't do that!
In the U.S. word problems are perceived as "scary"; both students AND
teachers tend to be afraid of them, and teachers might even omit solving them. This doesn't help, of course.
Here's a joke that Toom had included in his article, by Lynn Nordstrom:
"Student's Misguide to Problem Solving":
- Rule 1: If at all possible, avoid reading the problem.Reading the problem only consumes time and causes confusion.
- Rule 2: Extract the numbers from the problem in the order they appear. Be on the watch for numbers written in words.
- Rule 3: If rule 2 yields three or more numbers, the best bet is adding them together.
- Rule 4: If there are only 2 numbers which are approximately the same size, then subtraction should give the best results.
- Rule 5: If there are only two numbers and one is much smaller than the other, then divide if it goes evenly -- otherwise multiply.
- Rule 6: If the problem seems like it calls for a formula, pick a formula that has enough letters to use all the numbers given in the problem.
- Rule 7: If the rules 1-6 don't seem to work, make one last desperate attempt. Take the set of numbers found by rule 2 and perform about two pages of random operations using these numbers. You should circle about five or six answers on each page just in case one of them happens to be the answer. You might get some partial credit for trying hard.
I hope your students do not fit the above joke.
In my books, I've tried to avoid problems that would lead children to the above scenario. I do not claim to be perfect in this; I feel I have lots to learn. But I will keep striving to make problems that do require many steps and that do not "dumb down" our children, but that progressively get more difficult as school years go by.
See also
what I've written in the past concerning word problems.
Natarle Badeiguel, one of the few survivors of ZAFT’s Le Creuset’s raid to seize the new weapons of the colony, is one of Earth Alliance’s most loyal and promising young officers. She is the executive officer of the Archangel, a ship headed by Captain Murrue Ramius. She is a superb tactical analyst, a fine trait that made her a captain of her own ship, Dominion, after her former captain began to question the Earth Alliance’s actions.
The sadistic Puppet Master who thinks of people as merely his toys, Dietrich von Lohengrin is described to be a genius with an angelic face and a demonic heart. He is also the only known Terran in the Rosen Kreuz Orden.
I’d have to agree with Ying Dong. I like cosplayers who have that natural look/fit as well. If it just so happens that their natural hair color is the same as the character’s, then it’s plus points!
